<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Enable ITC Processing with ATI CCC?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.azzx.org/software/drivers/enable-itc-processing-with-ati-ccc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.azzx.org/software/drivers/enable-itc-processing-with-ati-ccc/</link> <description>A Gamers Perspective</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:37:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jordy</title><link>http://www.azzx.org/software/drivers/enable-itc-processing-with-ati-ccc/comment-page-1/#comment-77280</link> <dc:creator>Jordy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:43:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azzx.org/?p=271#comment-77280</guid> <description>This ATI card has more features than I understand, but so far it appears that letting the TV handle things works best.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ATI card has more features than I understand, but so far it appears that letting the TV handle things works best.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bhumketfwork</title><link>http://www.azzx.org/software/drivers/enable-itc-processing-with-ati-ccc/comment-page-1/#comment-76573</link> <dc:creator>bhumketfwork</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 03:39:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azzx.org/?p=271#comment-76573</guid> <description>&quot;It will be no doubt much more capable of producing a better picture than the tv is using it’s own processors. If the image looks good why bother turning this feature on anyway.&quot; Can about it more?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It will be no doubt much more capable of producing a better picture than the tv is using it’s own processors. If the image looks good why bother turning this feature on anyway.&#8221;<br /> Can about it more?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AzzX</title><link>http://www.azzx.org/software/drivers/enable-itc-processing-with-ati-ccc/comment-page-1/#comment-65003</link> <dc:creator>AzzX</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:55:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azzx.org/?p=271#comment-65003</guid> <description>To be honest I cant see a difference either way so I have left it enabled.  All my media is via xbmc for windows which may be why.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest I cant see a difference either way so I have left it enabled.  All my media is via xbmc for windows which may be why.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jimbob</title><link>http://www.azzx.org/software/drivers/enable-itc-processing-with-ati-ccc/comment-page-1/#comment-65001</link> <dc:creator>jimbob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:46:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azzx.org/?p=271#comment-65001</guid> <description>@Tim let the graphics card handle the video processing fully if the video already looks good. It will be no doubt much more capable of producing a better picture than the tv is using it&#039;s own processors. If the image looks good why bother turning this feature on anyway.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim let the graphics card handle the video processing fully if the video already looks good. It will be no doubt much more capable of producing a better picture than the tv is using it&#8217;s own processors. If the image looks good why bother turning this feature on anyway.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://www.azzx.org/software/drivers/enable-itc-processing-with-ati-ccc/comment-page-1/#comment-51109</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 04:54:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azzx.org/?p=271#comment-51109</guid> <description>So for example, I have a super nice new 52&quot; sharp LCD it&#039;s almost brand-new and originally was like $2000, and I have a super nice new HP computer with a brand-new radeon 5670, so am I better off with ITC checked or cleared?  I understand what it does, but I don&#039;t understand if it&#039;s good or bad in my particular situation?  Thanks, if anyone replies to this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So for example, I have a super nice new 52&#8243; sharp LCD it&#8217;s almost brand-new and originally was like $2000, and I have a super nice new HP computer with a brand-new radeon 5670, so am I better off with ITC checked or cleared?  I understand what it does, but I don&#8217;t understand if it&#8217;s good or bad in my particular situation?  Thanks, if anyone replies to this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 25/39 queries in 0.072 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 390/395 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.azzx.org @ 2012-02-11 04:51:57 -->
